Food Politics

The slip instruction in which the prov curiosityer schema is weakness us ar numerous. It is failing just ab break through in quantity, while failing some others in quality. The tho members of the victuals body that are non military personnel exploited are the unified fare producers, and that is beca single-valued function they are the exploiters in this equation. Just like the schoolyard that we are any familiar with, in that respect are two groups on the diet form vacation spot the bullied and the bullies. In comparison to the schoolyard example, the bullies are in the minority, consisting here of multinational corporations and other large organizations with nonpareil close in mind improvement maximization.In the bulk are the bullied, consisting of non ba desire the minusculely drink uprs such(prenominal)(prenominal) as you and I, but to a fault sm all farms and even organisation organizations. While the exhibit victuals outline has some(prenomi nal) flaws that check got led to this toxic playground consanguinity, at that place are solutions. We hope to clearly demonstrate where the intellectual nourishment system is today, how this present intellectual nourishment system is failing us, subsumeions to the Antony and Samuelson text, and lastly solutions. The term diet politics invokes to the political aspects of ware, program line, code, control, and dispersal of aliment for thought.Since biblical multiplication, the government has played a dominant role in the production and gibe of nourishment. The record of generation states the Egyptian pharaoh took 20 percent of all solid pabulum production from his farmers as tax (4724). This demonstrates the regulatory role that the government has had in viands production since the beginning of complaisantization. The key parties in provender politics are consumers, farmers, aliment sentry go and quality regulators, retailers and the state. Today, customers demand support fit intellectual nourishment, and so placing increase crush on producers to mediate expenditures.There is rich viands to move the world, and at that place has been for umpteen an(prenominal) decades. In 2007, the provender and Agriculture Organization calculated that there is enough pabulum to feed the world 1. 5x over (Holt-Gimenez and Patel 2009). While there is fit fodder to end world hunger, the enigma check-to doe withs collect to greed and incommensurate might distribution. foreign policies by the introduction Health Organization (WHO) deplete attempted to put an end to world hunger, but beca apply the outcomes of these policies do non benefit the bottom lines of he state and of corporations, they are not support (Paarlberg 2011). In our confess backyard, the Canadian government has removed restrictions surrounding station ownership regulations, and then facilitating the redistribution of Canadian farm visit. As far back as 1969, the re were suggestations from the federal government to reduce the number of Canadian farmers by 50 to 65 percent, encouraging the cause toward a factory- agriculture model (Paarlberg, 2011). pulverisation horticulture is a model recognized for its increased efficiency and fruit in farm. This is when the quality of food diminishes.Low quality food is something every consumer encounters on a daily basis, however the ability to make decisions surrounding food quality survival of the fittests is greatly dependent on economic standing. despite the regard to purchase high quality food, this whitethorn not be financially feasible. nourishment imported and exported to Canada is inspected and regulated by the Canadian nutriment superintendence Agency, which is planetaryly recognized for its standards and principles (CFIA). There are two major issues veneering the CFIA. Firstly, their standards and principals are comparable to those of the united States, the closely obese nation on earth and not a worthy role model.Secondly, as of revered 2011, meat inspection methods have moved to a two-tier system payable to budget constricts. The CFIA cannot afford to regulate meat nationwide and as such have relegated provincial sales and slaughter to that specific level of government and with it the ability to enforce self-consistent countrywide standards. With common origins in the capitalist system the agro-food sector is arguably sensation of the most planetaryized in the several(a) spheres of economic activity. Corporations have already been identified as one of the largest players in the food system, with the majority of these businesses be Agri-Transnational Corporations (TNCs).This is following two decades of economic liberalization, allowing Agri-TNCs to expand enormously in size, power and regularize. Bayer, Monsanto and DuPont are a few of the known agri-transnational corporations, the key players in this ball-shapedization and domination game ( ETC Group 2008). In total, there are six large agro chemical manufacturers that control intimately 75% of the ball-shaped pesticide securities industry, and are as well as seed industry giants. thus creating an oligopoly (ETC Group 2008). A small collection of large companies produces the majority of goods, freehanded consumers the ability to choose the best of the worst.This allows the corporations belonging to the oligopoly to collaborate on footing, twain at a consumer and employee level, protecting their profit margins by continually oppressing the consumers and workers into any accepting the offered price, or receiving slide fastener. Farmers are frequently bound by lengthy contracts to buy farm inputs from, and sell a specified crop, to the same corporation. This translates into farmers creation held at ransom at every step of production. They are super dependent on a corporate package while denying communities control over their own food and future.The package c onsists of high-cost inputs including synthetic fertilizers, chemical pesticides and unsustainable genetically modified seeds that do not germinate as slowly, ensuring the continuous troll of dependency. The push towards industrial, high-input agriculture is driving farmers into debt. They must guide on out loans in give to afford modified seeds, and much impressive fertilizers and pesticides. The vast majority of food related TNCs divvy up the same quality of h archaicing global enthronisations in the food industry and controlling much of how food is startn, neat, distributed and purchased.The afores attend(prenominal) oligopoly creates a relationship of dependence. Both the consumers and employees are dependent on these TNCs on a daily basis. Because TNCs dominate the industry in these countries, and government regulation is lacking, the tolerate army of labour is highly exploitable. If these workers are fired from the TNCs, there are few other employers with which to s eek work. From a consumer perspective, most all of the products available in retail outlets are produced by these TNCs, with little choice of products from other companies. This market domination combined with the ollaboration between TNCs for price scene in a given market creates the perfect storm for these parties to be marginalized. As illustrated in Figure 1, ten companies own the majority of food products that we consume, but due to the fact that they have umpteen subsidiaries distributively with contrasting branding- consumers have a false sense of choice. Industrial food and farming practices not only deny topical anesthetic communities and innate pile control over their own water, forests, minerals, biodiversity, and land, but overly devalues their local anaesthetic wisdom and noesis of farming practices.This industrialization clearly abuses both the area around local citizens as headspring as the citizens themselves. While these parties, the majority of the popu lation, are disadvantaged as our food system industrializes, corporations and governments benefit by way of increased profits and domination. Implications of this shift are at the expense of depriving peasants and small food producers around the world of their basic human rights while limiting their alert livelihood, culture, health, and self-determination. A beat oning trend in recent years has been agro evoke production.We are seeing a partnership of multinationals such as BP global for the conversion of land to cash crop quite than subsistence production. Revisited again beneath the contract-growing model, Monsanto has created a short letter in which farmers cannot produce food for sustenance, but quite a they must employ monocropping. This increases dependency on purchased inputs and on foreign markets that communities have no say in, and therefore threatening local subsistence and food security. Agro fuels, also referred to as biofuels, are fuels derived from food cro ps such as corn, soya, canola, sugar cane, and oil. (Martini and shivah 2008). Massive deforestation in Brazil due to monocropping for agro fuels has ca employ the displacement of indigenous pots and devastating effectuate on the climate. The FAO argues that agro fuels account for 10% of food price rise, while the IMF and IFPRI claim 30%, and the cosmos Bank estimated a constituent of between 65% and 75%. (Chakraborrty and Phillips 2008). This information is inherent when evaluating the impact that agro fuels have in Brazil and in some(prenominal) another(prenominal)(prenominal) other countries and communities.In remnant crave in Our Lifetime, food security is defined as access by all people at all times to enough food for an active florid life (Runge, Senauer, Pardey, and Rosegrant 200315). The World Health Organization (WHO) expands on this concept and presents the collar pillars of food security (1) Availability having a consistent supply and sufficient quantity of fo od, (2) Accessibility having the resources to ensure a alimental diet, and (3) food Use appropriate use centered around having implicit in(p) familiarity of nutrition (Schanbacher 201012).When discussing food politics, a central issue is the impendent threat to food security. victuals insecurity is encouraged by umpteen potential bump factors including, but not limited to, globalization, population harvest-home, great deal policies, food aid, a loss of agri pagan productivity, and the genetic revision of food. doubting Thomas Malthus, an 18th century economist and author of On the Principle of people wrote that food is bringment to the existence of man and that the passion between the sexes is necessary and volition never cease. (Malthus 1798).He then suggested that while population will continue to grow in a geometrical ratio (1,2,4,8, etc), that land subsistence only grows in an arithmetic sequence (1,3,5,7, etc) and is therefore unable to support the population, thus make up a threat to food security. The powerful forces deep down the food system op induce this Malthusian theory with the argument that the rate of population growth is slowing, which overall is true, but population growth continues to soar in the poorest countries the countries where food insecurity is the biggest concern.Figure 2 Population Growth 1990-2100 PopulationIncrease (%) 1990202521001990-2100 Developing Countries4. 087. 0710. 20150 Developed Countries1. 211. 401. 5024 World5. 308. 4711. 70121 ascendant United Nations 1993. Doha, Qatar. It aimed to promote trade liberalization as a nitty-gritty of rendering developing countries less vulnerable to food insecurity. The reduction of worldwide trade protections and tariffs afterwards the 1994 Uruguay Round led to the rapid transfer of products throughout the world, but not at an equal rate or proportion.When speech production on these imbalances, the Doha Declaration stated We agree that special and variousial g ear treatment for developing countries shall be an integral part of all elements of the negotiations and shall be embodied in the schedules of concessions and commitments and as appropriate in the rules and disciplines to be negotiated, so as to be operationally effective and to enable developing countries to in effect take account of their instruction needs, including food security and rural development (WTO 2001).These imbalances were prevalent after the 2008 economic crisis as more developed, and thus powerful, countries were able to protect themselves from loss of profit through restrictive trade policies. By limiting imports, which tend to come from developing nations, developed countries were able to alleviate damages. Take for example the differing trends in Asia and Africa present in Figure 3 In Asia, rates of undernourishment were stable post 2008, while they blush wine significantly in Africa (FAO 2011).As defined by the Canadian outside(a) reading Agency (CIDA), food aid is a response to address the dietetic and nutritional needs of vulnerable populations, to help and enhance their livelihoods and depart self-reliant, all essential for sustainable development. (CIDA n. d. ). It is important to establish that food aid is not the answer to food security and that there are many warpes that exist within its system. Amongst others, food aid has been criticized for being donor directed, promoting interior(prenominal) interests, being driven by exporters, and that development is not the primary goal.This criticism has led some to refer to food aid as food dumping as the low-budget food being offered to poorer nations at highly subsidized prices undercuts the local farmers who cannot compete with these prices. They are then driven out of their jobs, which further slants the market in favour of large producers such as those from the US and Europe (Runge, Senauer, Pardey and Rosegrant 2003125). The the States soon provides about 60% of all inte rnational food aid and its primary recipients are Peru, Haiti, India, Indonesia, Vietnam, Jordan, Egypt and the Philippines.Given their massive donations, many the Statesn agricultural student residence groups hoped food aid would lure recipients into dependence, and that when taken away, the beneficiaries would be agonistic to become applying customers. In an attempt to avoid entering into the coercive relationship that is food aid, some countries have prime substitute(a) strategies to deal with food shortages. wiz method is an alteration of diet from eating fewer meals each day to consuming less desirable famine foods and selling non-essential assets in order to purchase food (Paarlberg 201072).In nutrient Aid A cause, or symptom, of development calamity, or an instrument for success? Srinivasan asserts that food aid blunts incentives for domestic food production and hence increases the probability of long-term dependency on donors or that by alleviating food shortages, i t enables the regime in power to postpone, if not abandon, politically costly economic reforms. (1993). In line with this assertion comes the proffer to replace traditional food aid with a one-time distribution of farming equipment, livestock, and money in a bid to return people to their antecedently productive lifestyles.One of the ways in which donors hold power over recipient countries is through Structural Adjustment Programmes (SAPs), promoted by the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). SAPs are imposed under the guise of assisting countries in bringing their national macroeconomic conditions to a place where they can benefit from regional and international trade agreements. (Schanbacher 201014). A SAP will require countries to limit their social unhazardousty nets and to enter basic necessities such as food, water and land into the private sector.These prescriptions require countries to reduce social ripety nets and introduce survival necessities like foo d, water and land to the commodity market in order to receive the loans they need (Samuelson and Antony 2012246). These specifications have led to increase food insecurity, a lack of social protections (namely health care and education) and a widening of class inequality. One manifestation of a lack of food security in a given society may take the form of riots.Food riots are ca utilize by a jump in food prices, which gists from crop failure, ineffective storage methods and hoarding (Lang and Heasman 200412). In a terrible attempt to obtain nutrients, the national may become desperate and defeated enough to attack shops, farms and government buildings. In a recent earthly concern and Mail article entitled Food riots What creates the anger? Evan Fraser, co-author of the book Empires of Food Feast, dearth and the Rise and Fall of Civilizations wrote that its the sense of in evaluator rather than price volatility that ultimately causes the rioting.In 2011, President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, the worlds largest exporter of wheat, ordered over 800,000 tonnes of the grain and stockpiled it in an attempt to avoid civil unrest. His plan failed and infuriated citizens took to the streets in protest (Globe and Mail 2011). If food prices continue to rise at their current rate, we can only assume that the frequence and intensity of foot riots will increase. With profit being the primary goal of most involved in the agricultural system, monocropping has been employed by many of the worlds food producers.As defined by Schanbacher in The administration of Food (201056), monocropping refers to the practice of growing the same crop year after year without rotation to other crops. This method is economically rewarding for farms as it produces higher yields, allows them to invest in crop-specific equipment and because many governments provide subsidies to farms which utilize this method. By continuously growing a single crop, (namely soybeans, wheat and corn), the land bec omes dispirited of its nutrients and therefore highly dependent on fertilizers and incapable of supporting vegetive life.Those employing this method often choose to abandon the land after leeching it of its nutrients, as it is less expensive than working to maintain it. Furthermore, just as fatality rate rates in the Native American population soared after being exposed, by European settlers, to infectious diseases to which they were not immune, monocropping exposes crops to the same situation as they lose their genetic diversity. Take for example the Irish Potato Famine of 1845, which occurred after potatoes were introduced in response to the suffering economy and extremely low wages of the working class.though originally intended to serve as a supplement, potatoes swiftly became a staple of the Irish diet and when a bacterium travelled to the UK in 1845, the entire crop was wiped out. Over the next three years, one in eight Irish died of starvation, but unfortunately, many of us seem not to have learnt our lesson (Nestle 2007247). In fact, the US government currently offers substantial subsidies to those farming the primary monocropping products corn, soybeans and wheat. When discussing public wellbeing in the United States of America, one often references the Food and Drug institution (FDA).The FDAs mandatory is to promote safety through ensuring that conventional foods, dietary supplements, and drugs are safe and accurately labeled, and to ensure that drugs have benefits confirmed in clinical trials (Nestle 2007227). Despite being an American institution, the FDA has many international interests and is considered the de facto standard around the world. In 2009, President Barack Obama called the FDAs failure to inspect more than 95% of food processing plants a hazard to public health (Paarlberg 2010158).Many members of the general public have called for additional funding to support more complete inspection coverage, which would alleviate the signific ant pressure that is currently being placed on small and innate farms that cannot compete with their large competitors with ties to the FDA. The Food and Drug Administration is also responsible for researching and publishing information some the safety of different foods. Of particular concern are the potential attempts associated with the consumption of Genetically modified foods.Despite claims that there are no studies showing cogitate between GM foods and health risks, in 1998 the FDA was laboured to publicize more than 44,000 internal documents noting links with allergies, toxins, new diseases, anti-biotic resistant diseases, nutritional problems and cancer causing agents (Paarlberg 2010168). In 1961 the World Health Organization instated the Codex Alimentarius Commission whose purpose was to create international food safety standards, but to this day there are free many dangerous chemicals in use (Lang, Heasman 200448).Though guidelines exist to limit the use of chemical s in genetically modified foods, little is done about those used in animal feed and other by-products that are eventually consumed by humanity. Due to bioaccumulation, the progressive increase in the amount of a shopping centre in an organism or part of an organism which occurs because the rate of dream exceeds the organisms ability to remove the substance from the body. the effect of these toxins only increases as the products arrive at the top of the food chain humans (U. S. Geological Survey 2007).These pesticides provide a pathway for Persistent constituent(a) Pollutants, which we store in our body fat and which have a negative impact on humans, wildlife, land and water (Lang and Heasman 2004 225). In fact, tonic waters have been linked to everything from cancer to reproductive and birth defects to neurological diseases. Though food producers are expected to follow CDCA (Centre for Disease Control Agency) guidelines, this only protects consumers if they ingest a single po rtion of an individual item (Lang and Heasman 2004 226,227).Foods with the highest levels of POPs include butter, melons, cucumbers, peanuts, popcorn, spinach and squash (Lang and Heasman 2004227). This poses a major problem as even if foods are individually within the CDCA guidelines, collectively they pose major risks. With the recent trend towards Green government activity, the amount of pesticides used has decreased and due to biased education the general public has expect this to mean that our food is safer. Unfortunately, the toxicity of pesticides used has increased approximately 10-100x since 1975 thus putting consumers at great risk (Lang and Heasman 2004227).One cannot discuss Genetically change foods without referring to the Monsanto Corporation. In 2001, Monsanto was listed as 3 in the world when it came to agrochemical sales and many have labeled it the worlds most unethical company (Nestle 2007101). They are a world leader in the production of genetically modified f oods and they created the highly poisonous herbicide Roundup which is incredibly damaging to both ecology and humans. Unfortunately, Monsanto, and many other companies like them, have taken advantage of their coiffures of power to bias the public in favour of their products.In a 1999-2000 American Dietetic intimacy nutrition fact sheet sponsored by Monsanto, they said, The U. S. government has a well co-ordinated system to ensure that new agricultural biotechnology products are safe for the environment and to animal and human health (Nestle 2007113). Given that the ADA represents the interests of 70,000 nutritionists many see their fact sheets to be trustworthy, but we need to be more wary as many ADA certified nutritionists are in fact employed by companies like the Monsanto Corporation (Nestle 2007113).In Das Kapital, Karl Marx presents the view of commodity fetishism that in a capitalist society, money and commodities are fetishes that inhibit our ability to see the reality of a given situation because we view them as relationships between goods as opposed to a relationship between people. In the baptistery of food security, commodity fetishism prevents people from acknowledging that individual was exploited to produce a given product and that our choices as consumers support this unfair treatment (Thomson 2010164-166).This purposeful distancing of the owners from their means of production allows them, and as a leave behind, the average consumer, to disengage from the food system. Raj Patel, the author of Stuffed and ravenous connects this to one of the three pillars of food security- food approachability- and says that the fantasy of those not willing to pay has removed the need for compassion from food economics, as if to say that it is someones choice to go hungry as opposed to their unfitness to afford or meet the high asking price. . This enables society to deliberate that our choices at the checkout dont take away the choices of those who grow our food (2008). In federal agency and Resistance, Sandy Miller discusses the idea of food as inhalant and imperative for social change. She outlines ways in which the food system is failing and some potential solutions. Amongst them, Miller focuses on modification of land use practices, ownership of food infrastructure, accessibility to land, food distribution policy, and alternative food movements.The road is long, and not well travelled, but there is hope for a revolution within our global food system and it rests on civil society becoming more instilld and thus, engaged. We have to ask questions Where does our food come from? What is actually in it? What constitutes a bouncing diet? We have to change the way people think about food- they have to be the change. Without people standing up, asking questions, and actually practicing what they preach, nothing will change. Though land is widely considered to be a renewable resource, we must examine the veracity of this claim. nati on has the capacity to renew itself, but as more infrastructure is built, less cropland is available and as a result that which remains is often exposed to overuse and abuse as was antecedently explained in the instance of monocropping. Furthermore, due to this leeching of nutrients from the soil, erosion rates have speed up to the point where land reformation cannot occur and genetically modified seeds and fertilizers (such as Monsantos RoundUp) are being used more prevalently.When crops are pornographic on land that has been leeched of its nutrients, the produce yielded from there will too be nutrient-weak one example being genetically modified rice. This rice has vitamin A added to it, however to meet your recommended daily intake of vitamin A, one would need to consume fifty bowls of (Norton 2012). Miller presents the idea of land reserves as an important route in the labyrinth of solutions. A land reserve is a zone in which agriculture is recognized as the antecedency use, w here farming is encouraged and non-agricultural uses are controlled (ALC 2012).Miller references one very successful case study British Columbias Agricultural inflict unobtrusiveness (ALR). The ALR covers almost 5 billion hectares of private and public land that may be farmed, forested or vacant and any person or people intending on using this land must plan in accordance with the ALR mandate of preserving agricultural land (Samuelson and Antony 2012257). Because the primary goal of food producers is profit, they are not concerned with proper land maintenance and, as a result, the nutritional value of their goods.When discussing land, it is essential to consider its accessibility and distribution, as this is a major indicator of who maintains ownership of the food infrastructure. In a 2011 paper released by the United Nations, titled Corruption in the Land Sector, the Food and Agriculture Organizations reported that Effective and enforceable land politics provides a necessary fr amework for development and an important defense against many forms of corruption. It supports food security and ensures sustainable livelihoods that are essential for people and countries that rely on land as one of their main economic, social and cultural assets.For example, empirical findings from more than 63 countries show that where corruption in land is less prevalent, it correlates to better development indicators, higher levels of foreign direct investment and increased crop yields. (FAO 2011) A national example of this ineffective and unenforceable land validation can be seen in Ontario where the local food infrastructure has been consistently dismantled by the government as they offer payouts to farmers willing to surrender planting fruit trees in favour of more economically practicable options such as real estate investments (FAO 2011).When interviewed, farmers and stakeholders proposed solutions that would reframe the food chain from farming to processing to storage, distribution and marketing. (Samuelson and Antony 2012258-259). To reach the goal of more equitable distribution of, and access to land, many food movements rely on social justice and well-distributed power. These movements recognize that our current food system is in need of an democratic perspective on food infrastructure. Agroecology may be one of the most influential food movements thus far.This movement promotes the potential to create a new way of living in which the presence of humans will not destroy our planet. Samuelson and Antony describe agro ecology as a way of thinking in tune with an agricultural ecosystem that tests and authorizes problems where they arise, in the context of local pests and beneficials, climatic benefits and challenges, and the realities of locally financed and managed farming. . Among other techniques, agroecology also involves the use of century old farming methods such as crop rotation.Crop rotation involves planting in a multi-year cycle so as to avoid depletion of nutrients, and susceptibility to pests (2012260). La Via Campesina, a peasant organization, is dedicated to promoting food sovereignty through the use of natural resources and support of domestic markets. Canadas National Farmers Union constitutes one group which makes up the 150 million members from 69 different countries. La Via Campesinas mandate is to grant membership merely to peasants (representatives of large corporations are not welcome) and to ensure that power remains within the workforce of the majority (Samuelson and Antony 2012259).Another alternative to supporting these large corporations, The Farm-to-Community Movement, is presented in Food Politics How the Food patience Influences Nutrition and Health this category aims to connect farmers to local communities through farmers markets, community supported agriculture (customers pay farmers in advance for seasonal produce), and programs that link farmers to schools, restaurants, and other ins titutions. (Nestle 2007x). Community tends are another popular strategy that can help provide safe and alimental food while simultaneously supporting local infrastructure.A community garden is a local plot of land worked on by a group of people who share the work, as well as the crops. In this process food is not fetishized as a commodity, instead creating an alternative to capitalism as well as providing the benefit of intelligent, local, and organic food. Acadia University features a community garden, allowing for students and community members to have the opportunity to grow their own crops. In addition to splitting the yield amongst its members, the garden supplies food to the Wheelock dining hall, along with Wolfvilles local food bank.Many have created community gardens in what lacuna they have in their own backyards and most of these gardens function as charities. This allows people living in poverty the opportunity to eat local and organic food they may otherwise be unab le to afford thus bolstering all three pillars of food security accessibility, availability and food use. The presence of community gardens is one aspect of food relocalization a movement which focuses on eating, growing and distributing locally as a means of lowering one C emissions (due to shorter travel time) and of stimulating the local economy.Relocalization focuses on advocating changes in scale, ownership, and relationships from one end of the supply chain to the other. This practice is employed by communities around the world who harvest enough food to sustain themselves, but do not produce for profit. This process is concerned with feeding all members of the given community, and is considered an effective means of eradicating poverty. In 2007, chef and restaurateur Jamie Oliver founded the Pass It On food movement, which encourages healthy eating, habits through a method of education, which promotes exponential growth in its followers.His inspiration came from the British Ministry of Foods attempt to manage food shortages by educating the public about proper nutrition during World War II (Oliver 20098). With this in mind, he formed his own radical movement in an effort to raise awareness and incite action to help solve the food crisis. In 2010, the largest killers in America were diet-related diseases (TEDTalks 2010). This is the fuel behind the movements transfer to the United States, more specifically, Huntington Beach, Virginia the fattest town in America (Oliver 2009).He was met with widespread criticism and a general lack of acceptance due to his harsh critique of the American school system. Oliver suggests a weekly session, 30-60 minutes, to educate children on nutrition and healthy meal options (TEDTalks 2010). This solution would be both easy to implement and inexpensive, meaning the government would not have to cut any presently funded programs in order to reallocate finances. Oliver also suggests introducing food ambassadors into local sup ermarkets.These ambassadors would be tasked with showing consumers what to buy, how to read labels, and how to cook quick and healthy meals (TEDTalks 2010). The costs of such an initiative would be borne by either the corporations who own products sold in the supermarket or the supermarket itself. Oliver believes that big corporations need to put food education on the top of their priority list, and at the heart of their businesses because a large part of change lies in their hands (TEDTalks 2010). They have a corporate responsibility to provide a new, fresh standard of food, and we, as consumers must hold them accountable.While it may feel like there is no way to avoid being failed by the food system, there is a solution to the problem that you can implement on your own, without the need to influence others. There are many publications released each year, discussing what constitutes healthy eating, but there is one that supersedes the other in terms of influencing the eating choice s of the average Canadian citizen Canadas Food signal. Canadas Food look at was overhauled in 2007, and renamed ingest Well with Canadas Food Guide (Health Canada 2011).While the majority of the Canadian population, including schools and other public institutions, use this guide when planning meals they have little to no understanding as to how this guide was developed. The Food in force(p) Advisory citizens committee conducted the redesign of the guide in 2007, with members appointed by Health Canada (Health Canada 2011). One would assume that the members of this committee would be physicians and nutritionists that had a keen interest in the betterment of our heath that they would be using their knowledge for good.A closer question of the members of this committee uncovers the contrary that many of the members have a strong skirmish of interests. Paul Paquin held the position of chair at the time of the 2007 Food Guide revisions, while simultaneously acting as vice-president of the International Dairy confederacy (Health Canada 2012). Paquin is not alone in holding a conflicting position while on the Food Expert Advisory Committee. Also advocating for the dairy farm industry is committee member Dr.Mansel Griffiths, who is concurrently on the Expert scientific Advisory Committee for Dairy Farmers of Canada (Health Canada 2012). With our Food Guide in the hands of such individuals, is it any wonder that dairy has its own distinct category in our Food Guide? Separate from the interests of these members of the committee, there is also the issue of meat in Canadas food guide. In 2011, Harvard University released a study on the effects of red meat, disclosing that consumption leads to an increase of conclusion due to cancer and heart disease, as well to an overall risk of death (Harvard School of humans Health 2012).The study detailed that one daily serving of unprocessed meat increased the overall risk of mortality by 13%, while the same serving of proc essed meat increased the risk by 20% (Harvard School of Public Health 2012). This then begs the question of why it is so ingrained in the minds of civil society that we need animal protein to survive? Despite these findings being published by a well-respected institution, Canadas Food Guide continues to recommend two daily servings of meat for adult females and three for adult males (Health Canada 2007).They also suggest eating two servings of fish a week, and choosing lower sodium luncheon (processed) meat products (Health Canada 2007). Providing that an individual does eat two servings of fish a week that leaves 12-19 servings available for the consumption of red meat. Canadas Food Guide fails to reflect these well-researched findings because they are not in the best interest of the one-percent. oxen farming, both for dairy and beef are lucrative industries in Canada, and they share close ties with the ruling class.The government is invested in protecting the presently establishe d capitalist environment, that of bottom lines and the best interests of the minority- capitalist corporations- and in doing so is harming the majority- its citizens. As has been shown in this report, food security is part and parcel of a larger cycle of social problems. In Power and Resistance, Antony and Samuelson present some of the issues which are both affected by and effect the matter of food security persistent poverty in Canada, Indian residential schools, and the global economic crisis.Though not comparable to many developing countries around the world, it is essential to note that food insecurity does exist in developed countries such as Canada. In the 2007-2008 census it was reported that 7. 2% of Canadians were living in households that were food insecure (Health Canada). A primary contributing factor to the unfitness of Canadians to access food is its high cost. In 2012, Dieticians of Canada released the report The Cost of take in in BC 2011 which drew attention to the fact that many British Columbians dont have the resources to afford nutritious food.This is due, in large part, to the significant rise in food and shelter costs and the unvarying welfare rates (Dietitians Canada). In essence, people are not earning any more but their costs are rising meaning they cannot afford what Food Secure Canada calls safe food nourishing foods being right away at hand and the restriction of unhealthy products. One of the most necessitous groups in Canada is our Aboriginal community and as was presented, much of the school-age population was forced into residential schools up until 1998 when the last band school was dismantled.In these residential schools, food accessibility was of major concern as poor nutrition and the refuse of food were used as a means of control and suppression. fifty-fifty after the closure of these institutions, the aboriginal community is continuing to feel the effects of its governments exploitation. A 2010 study from the Univer sity of Western Ontario found that paternal residential school attendance had a positive correlation with experiencing food insecurity, and that food insecurity was negatively correlated with doing well in school. In Health Canadas 2007-2008 report on Household Food Insecurity, 20. % of Aboriginals were found to be living in food insecure households- this is 3 times higher than the non-Aboriginal households. The global financial and economic crisis has pushed an additional 100 million people into hunger in 2009, bringing the overall number of undernourished people in the world to over one billion. (FAO). The current crisis shadowy the climbing price of food and significantly limited food accessibility worldwide. In 2009, domestic staple foods in developing countries cost approximately 20% more than they did in 2007 (FAO).In order to deal with food insecurity, which flat threatens development, many households have been forced to implement negative coping strategies such as selling of assets, becoming trapped in debt, withdrawing children from school, illegal activities, and forced migration. Furthermore, with the simultaneous decline in income and rise in food costs, individuals often reduce spending on safe food- primarily meat, dairy products, fruits and vegetables. What is clear from these examples is that there is a pervasive interconnectedness and that in order to make progress, multi-faceted and situation-appropriate approaches must be developed.To conclude, while it is easy to fall into the traps that result in the exploitative relationship between multinational producers and consumers, there are other options. The current food system is laden with large organizations that take advantage of limited consumer knowledge combined with government partnerships. This pairing allows for consumer knowledge to stay at a level where they can be easily exploited, demonstrating that the government is a key player in the continued failure of the food system in the eyes of their own citizens. All is not lost, as there are ways that individual consumers can ebb the ffects that this failure has on them. The solution is for consumers and other members of the bullied group to look out for their own interests. Having the maximum control and knowledge about what is going in your body is paramount. ingest locally allows for the greatest possible understanding of the yarn of a given good before it reaches your plate. Be an informed citizen do research on the issues that affect your wellbeing, do not let power equal credibility, trust no one and question everything. References Agricultural Land Reserve. Provincial Agricultural Land Commission. Retrieved 11/26/12. http//www. alc. gov. bc. ca/alr/What_is_Ag_Land. htm). Canadian Biotechnology Action Network. (2012). Labeling of Genetically Engineered Chakraborrty, A. (2008). Exclusive we publish the biofuels report they didnt necessitate you to read. The Guardian, Retrieved from http//www. guardian. co. uk/environment Eberhardt, Jennifer, Paul Davies, Valerie Purdie-Vaughns, and Sheri Lynn Johnson. 2006. . Looking Deathworthy Perceived Stereotypicality of Black Defendants Predicts .. Capital Sentencing Outcomes. mental Science 17(3)383-386. Eric Holt-Gimenez and Raj Patel. 2009. Food Rebellions Forging Food Sovereignty to Solve the spheric Food Crisis . New York, New York Pambazuka mess, 2009. ETC Group. (2008). Who owns nature. Corporate Power and the Final marge in the Commodification of Life, No. (100), Retrieved from http//www. etcgroup. org/content/who-owns-nature Food Aid Reducing World Hunger Canadian International Development Agency. Retrieved 11/26/12 (http//www. acdi-cida. gc. ca/acdi-cida/acdi-cida. nsf/eng/JUD-24133116-PQL). Foods in Canada. Retrieved October 15, 2012, from Canadian Biotechnology Action Network http//www. cban. ca/Resources/Topics/Labeling Glossary Bioaccumulation. U. S.Geological Survey. 11/14/12. (http//water. usgs. gov/nawqa/glos. html). Gy orgy, S. (2003, July 10). Genetic agriculture designed to feed the rich, not the world. Globalism Institute at RMIT University, Retrieved from http//www. smh. com. au/articles/2003/07/09/1057430279267 Harvard School of Public Health. (2012). Press Releases. Retrieved October 14, 2012, from Harvard School of Public Health http//www. hsph. harvard. edu/ intelligence information/press- releases/2012-releases/red-meat-cardiovascular-cancer-mortality. html Health Canada. 2007. Eating Well With Canadas Food Guide. Retrieved October 14, 2012, from Health Canada http//www. c-sc. gc. ca/fn-an/alt_formats/hpfb- dgpsa/pdf/food-guide-aliment/view_eatwell_vue_bienmang-eng. pdf Health Canada. (2011, October 21). Food Expert Advisory Committee. Retrieved October 14, 2012, from Health Canada http//www. hc-sc. gc. ca/fn- an/consult/frac-ccra/index-eng. php Health Canada. (2012). Membership heel of the Food Expert Advisory Committee. Retrieved October 16, 2012, from Health Canada http//www. hc-sc. gc. ca/fn- an/consult/frac-ccra/memb-eng. php Lang, Tim and Michael Heasman. 2004. Food Wars The Global Battle for Mouths, Minds and Markets. Sterling, Virginia Earthscan. Leeder, Jessica. 011. Food riots What creates the anger? Globe and Mail. Retrieved October 15th 2012. (http//www. theglobeandmail. com/news/world/food-riots-what-creates-the-anger/article564412/) Leigh, P. (2008). Eu biofuels target probably a mistake, france says. Reuters EU Observer. Retrieved from http//euobserver. com/news/26419 Lymbery, Philip. 2012. Jargon Buster. Acompassionateworld. org. Retrieved November19, 2012 (http//www. acompassionateworld. org/jargon-buster). Malthus, T. R. , Winch, D. , & James, P. 1992. An essay on the principle of population. Cambridge, England Cambridge University Press. Martini, C. & Shiva, V. (2008). The international commission on the future of food and agriculture Manifesto on climate change and the future of food security. Arsia Regione Toscana Sesto Fiorentino (FI) by Pr ess Service Srl. DOI transfer//ftp. fao. org/paia/organicag/vandana_poster. pdf Marx, K. , Engels, F. , & Levitzky, S. L. 1970. Das Kapital, a critique of political economy. Chicago, Illinois Regnery Gateway. Nestle, Marion. 2007. Food Politics How the Industry Influences Nutrition and Health. London, England University of California Press. Norton, Amy. 2012. Genetically Modified Rice a groovy Vitamin A Source. Reuters. Retrieved 11/26/12 (http//www. reuters. com/article/2012/08/15/us-genetically-modified-rice-idUSBRE87E0RO20120815). Oliver, Jaime. 2009. Jamies Food Revolution. New York, NY, USA The Penguin Group. Paarlberg, Robert. 2010. Food PoliticsWhat Everyone necessarily to Know What Everyone Needs to Know. New York, New York Oxford University Press. Patel, Raj. 2009. Stuffed and Starved Markets, Power and the Hidden Battle for the Worlds Food System. Review of African Political Economy 36(119)143-144. Philip, M. (2009). Critical sociology The agrofuels project at large. (pp. 5(6) 825-839). New York Cornell University. Retrieved from http//devsoc. cals. cornell. edu/research/research-projects/upload/agrofuels-project-mcm-2009. pdf Public Service Alliance of Canada. 2011. Starved budgets are a threat to food safety. PSAC. November 19, 2012 (http//www. psac-afpc. com/issues/campaigns/3c/cfia-e. shtml). Runge, C. Ford. , Benjamin Senauer, Philip Pardey and Mark W. Rosegrant. 2003. Ending Hunger in our Lifetime Food Security and Globalization. Baltimore, Maryland The Johns Hopkins University Press. Samuelson, Les and Wayne Antony. 2012. Power and Resistance.Black Point, Nova Scotia and Winnipeg, Manitoba. Fernwood Publishing. Saving Crops, Saving Lives The Need for More Aggressive Support to mode Change Adaptation. Canadian Hunger Foundation. 11/14/12. (http//www. chf. ca/documents/Latest_News/Climate_Change_Adaptation. pdf). Schanbacher, William. 2010. The Politics of Food The Global Conflict between Foot Security and Food Sovereignty. Santa Barbar a, California Praeger. Srinivasan, T. N. 1993. Food Aid A cause, or symptom, of development failure, or an instrument for success? New Haven, Connecticut Yale University. TEDTalks (Director). 2010.Jamie Olivers TED Prize Wish Motion Picture. Tim Lang and Michael heasman. 2004. Food Wars The Global Battle for Mouths, Minds and Markets. Sterling, Virginia Earthscan. Thomson, Anthony. 2010. The Making of Social Theory Order, Reason and Desire. wear upon Mills, Ontario Oxford University Press. Working Paper Corruption in the Land Sector. Transparency International the global coalition against corruption. Retrieved 11/25/12. (http//www. fao. org/docrep/014/am943e/am943e00. pdf). WTO. 2001. The Doha Mandate. Retrieved November 17th 2012 (http//www. wto. org/ side of meat/tratop_e/agric_e/dohaagmandate_e. htm).